Federal awards · NAICS 237990
Who wins federal contracts in Other Heavy and Civil Engineering Construction
1,278 awards to 655 different firms, worth $1.2B between them, in the slice of USASpending data described at the foot of this page. Here is who took them, how tightly held the work is, and where it gets performed.
How concentrated is it
Widely spread — the top five hold 8.3% of the dollars
Of the $1.2B awarded across these 1,278 contracts, the five largest recipients hold 8.3% and the largest single one holds 3.5%. Widen it to ten firms and the share is 12.8%. By count rather than dollars, the top five took 9% of the awards.
455 of the 655 firms here — 69.5% — appear exactly once. That is the closest thing this data has to a “room at the bottom” reading: a slice where most winners appear once is one you can enter without displacing an incumbent, and a slice where they don’t is one where relationships are already set.
- Largest single recipient3.5% of dollars
- Top 5 recipients8.3% of dollars
- Top 10 recipients12.8% of dollars
- Everyone else87.2% of dollars
Who wins it
The 20 largest recipients
Ranked by total award value in this dataset. Names are as they appear on the award record; related legal entities of the same group are not merged, so a large prime may appear under more than one name across the wider data.
| # | Recipient | Awards | Total value | Share |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | KING CO INC | 43 | $41M | 3.5% |
| 2 | BUNDESMINISTERIUM FÜR UMWELT, NATURSCHUTZ UND REAKTORSICHERHEIT | 17 | $16M | 1.4% |
| 3 | MORRISH-WALLACE CONSTRUCTION, INC. | 13 | $15M | 1.2% |
| 4 | AMHERST MADISON, INC. | 16 | $14M | 1.2% |
| 5 | ALLTECH ENGINEERING CORP | 12 | $13M | 1.1% |
| 6 | GREAT LAKES DOCK AND MATERIALS, L.L.C. | 9 | $13M | 1.1% |
| 7 | DEAN MARINE AND EXCAVATING, INC. | 9 | $11M | 0.9% |
| 8 | PHILLIPS CONTRACTING CO., INC. | 9 | $11M | 0.9% |
| 9 | GALE CONSTRUCTION COMPANY OF ILLINOIS | 11 | $10M | 0.8% |
| 10 | INLAND DREDGING COMPANY, L.L.C. | 7 | $9.41M | 0.8% |
| 11 | LACREEK DEVELOPMENT CORP | 10 | $8.79M | 0.7% |
| 12 | TANNER HEAVY EQUIPMENT CO., L.L.C. | 9 | $8.17M | 0.7% |
| 13 | NOVA GROUP, INC. | 7 | $8.05M | 0.7% |
| 14 | MANSON CONSTRUCTION CO | 8 | $8M | 0.7% |
| 15 | ROEN SALVAGE CO. | 6 | $7.98M | 0.7% |
| 16 | MASSILLON CONSTRUCTION AND SUPPLY LLC | 8 | $7.56M | 0.6% |
| 17 | QSJV, LLC | 9 | $7.47M | 0.6% |
| 18 | PONTCHARTRAIN PARTNERS, LLC | 5 | $7.44M | 0.6% |
| 19 | INNOVATIVE PERFORMANCE CONSTRUCTION CO LLC | 6 | $7.41M | 0.6% |
| 20 | PINE BLUFF SAND AND GRAVEL COMPANY | 6 | $7.32M | 0.6% |
Who buys it
Agencies awarding other heavy and civil engineering construction work
| Agency | Awards | Total value | Share |
|---|---|---|---|
| Department of Defense | 871 | $844M | 70.8% |
| Department of the Interior | 158 | $133M | 11.1% |
| Department of Agriculture | 90 | $65M | 5.5% |
| Department of Homeland Security | 74 | $70M | 5.9% |
| Department of Veterans Affairs | 35 | $36M | 3% |
| Department of Transportation | 16 | $18M | 1.5% |
| Department of Energy | 10 | $9.36M | 0.8% |
| Department of Justice | 9 | $6.64M | 0.6% |
| Department of Commerce | 5 | $2.55M | 0.2% |
| General Services Administration | 3 | $3.28M | 0.3% |
Where it is performed
Top places of performance
Place of performance, not the winner’s headquarters — a firm based anywhere can hold a contract performed in Virginia. 89 of these awards carry no state on the record.
| State | Awards | Total value |
|---|---|---|
| CA | 93 | $93M |
| MI | 62 | $66M |
| WA | 62 | $67M |
| IL | 60 | $58M |
| MS | 43 | $49M |
| VA | 43 | $38M |
| LA | 42 | $49M |
| SD | 40 | $34M |
| MO | 37 | $42M |
| NY | 34 | $33M |
What size these awards are
Award sizes in this dataset
Half of these awards fall between $514k and $1.31M, with a median of $844k. Read that as a description of this dataset and nothing more: the underlying fetch has only reached down to $136,134 here, so the empty bands below are our coverage gap, not an absence of smaller contracts.
| Award size | Awards | Share |
|---|---|---|
| Under $100k | 0 | 0% |
| $100k - $250k | 89 | 7% |
| $250k - $500k | 208 | 16.3% |
| $500k - $1M | 474 | 37.1% |
| $1M - $1.5M | 280 | 21.9% |
| $1.5M - $2M | 227 | 17.8% |
| $2M (the fetch ceiling) | 0 | 0% |
All 324 categories and 44 agencies →
Honest about coverage
These pages count 351,812 federal contract awards pulled from USASpending.gov. Every one is a real, published award to a named winner. They are not all of federal spending, and reading them as if they were would mislead you.
The fetch asks USASpending for awards between $25,000 and $2,000,000 — the band a small business actually competes in. It reads them highest-value first, and it has not yet reached the bottom of that band. The smallest award currently in the dataset is $135,957. So what you are looking at is a mid-size slice: 351,812 awards between $135,957 and $2,000,000. It is not a representative sample of federal contracting, and it is emphatically not a sample of small awards.
What that means for the numbers on these pages
- Counts and shares are exact for this dataset. “The top five recipients hold 24% of the dollars” means 24% of the dollars in these 351,812 awards — not 24% of the sector.
- The medians and size bands describe this slice only. You will not find an “average federal contract value” anywhere on this site, because the distribution here is cut off at the bottom and that number does not exist in this data.
- A firm missing from a page has not necessarily stopped winning work — it may simply not have an award inside this band and these windows. Absence is not evidence here.
- We publish no “still active” or “gone quiet” signal. The data arrives in two fetch windows (2023-01-01 to 2025-07-25 and 2025-07-26 to 2026-07-25) that have reached different depths ($441,837 and $135,957), and the period-of-performance start date can predate either of them, so any recency claim would be measuring our own backfill rather than the market.
The backfill is still running, so the floor moves down over time and these pages are regenerated from it. Figures as of 2026-08-03. Always confirm an award on USASpending.gov before you act on it.
Have a proposal in draft? Get it checked — $29
Paste your draft and the solicitation. Bid-Smart reads it the way the evaluator will and names what fails before you submit — every finding quoted from your own text. First finding free, no account needed.
Check my draft →
Free FAR-grounded proposal templates
The volumes every solicitation asks for, with what wins points and what gets a proposal thrown out. No sign-up, no paywall.
Read the templates →
Get the federal opportunities brief
Open SAM.gov solicitations matched to your NAICS codes and set-asides — including other heavy and civil engineering construction — one email a day, free, no card.